Epstein Secrets

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 14 ANN , ESQ. 15 Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 East Broward Boulevard 16 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 For U.S.A. 17 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. 18 20 Park Plaza Boston MA 02116 19 (Via telephone) 617.227.3700 20 JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) 21 REPORTED BY: LARRY HERR,

3 MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, we have two members of the 14 defense team are on the phone, also. 15 THE COURT: Who do we have on the phone? 16 MR. WEINBERG: Martin Weinberg. Good morning, Your 17 Honor. 18 MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowitz. Good morning, Your 19 Honor. 20 THE COURT: Good morning. 21 I

your pivot& spook to B A. Ask ny parents. 9 0. ut'. too if I can peruke your neraOry at 10 le tee he i. . Okay? 11 A. 12 0. ite's the Vanity fair reporter eho aide • 13 financial arrangsni with your father. 14 A. 1 aware of that. And again, I vet Dot If pare ilte that my dad did It

From: Sent: To: Subject: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] 3/18/2016 4:58:46 PM Martin G. Weinberg Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Importance: High Privileged - Redacted On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Martin G. Weinberg < wrote: Privileged - Redac

[email protected]] 3/18/2016 4:58:46 PM Martin G. Weinberg Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Importance: High Pr

meone other than the stated author, James Patterson. Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; 3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a mi

y person outside of my immediate family that 1 send drafts to is Jeffrey” The Talented Mr. Epstein, By Vicky Ward on January, 2005 im Published Work, Vanity Fair; (c) Epstein’s housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez testified that Dershowitz stayed at Epstein’s house during the years most relevant to my clients; (

aim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of Edwards’ pursuit of the claims against him, See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla, 1* Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where “appellant’s lawsuit caused