Epstein Secrets

• Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Eli P Martin G. Weinberg. P.C. Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epste

e 400 inis ma West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek Es . • Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Eli P Martin G. Weinberg. P.C. Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 4 EFTA00188816 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Jcument 291-2 Entered on FLSD

ess. Richardson was properly identified as a possible witness because Epstein's personal pilot testified to Richardson joining Epstein at Epstein's New Mexico Ranch. There was information indicating that Epstein had young girls at his ranch which, given the circumstances of the case, raised the reasonable infer

very other defendant. Kenneth W. Starr Martin G. Weinberg Jack Goldberger Lilly Ann Sanchez A version of t

and made enormous monetary settlements relying on his negotiated agreement. He is entitled to finality like every other defendant. Kenneth W. Starr Martin G. Weinberg Jack Goldberger Lilly Ann Sanchez A version of this article appears in print on March 5, 2019, on Page A26 of the New York edition with the headline

. These records prove incontrovertibly that I could not have been, and was not, where Roberts’ falsely claimed to have met me — a Caribbean Island, a New Mexico Ranch, a private jet, a Palm Beach mansion — during the relevant time period. I also called for an independent investigation by the former Director of th

cases. Richardson was properly identified as a possible witness because Epstein’s personal pilot testified to Richardson joining Epstein at Epstein’s New Mexico Ranch. See deposition of Larry Morrison, October 6, 2009, at 167-169. There was information indicating that Epstein had young girls at his ranch which, giv

aim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of Edwards’ pursuit of the claims against him, See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla, 1* Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where “appellant’s lawsuit caused