Epstein Secrets

ery. . . . HIPAA regulations is (sic) purely procedural in nature and does not create a federal physician-patient or hospital-patient privilege.” Allen v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309485 *11 (E.D. Cal. 2007). Under HIPAA, health care information may be disclosed in discovery under a qualified protective o

r requests such other relief as this Court deems just and proper. Dated: March 2, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] ME

erefore, Epstein's HIPAA rights should be upheld. Allen v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309485 (E.D. Cal. 2007), (p

80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscay

verable. As to Defendant's HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) objection, as noted in the case cited in Plaintiff's motion, Allen v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309485 (E.D. Cal. 2007), (p. 9), HIPPA institutes procedural safeguards to protect the privacy of an individual's medical info

EREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 25th day of March, 2009. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 34 of 37 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Pa

hysician-patient or hospital-patient privilege." Allen v. Woodford 2007 WL 309485 *I I (E.D. Cal. 2007).

propriate. Plaintiff further requests such other relief as this Court deems just and proper. Dated: March 2, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) Adam D. Horowitz (It Bar No. 376980) MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscay

, as noted in the case cited in Plaintiffs motion Allen v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309485 (E.D. Cal. 2007), (p

EREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 25th day of March, 2009. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger EFTA00222107 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 34 of 37 Jane Doe No. 2 v.

hysician-patient or hospital-patient privilege." Allen v. Woodford 2007 WL 309485 *I I (E.D. Cal. 2007).

propriate. Plaintiff further requests such other relief as this Court deems just and proper. Dated: March 2, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTE

ght. BY MS. EZELL: Q. I believe you asked about Allen Dershowitz earlier. MR. REINHART: Twice. BY MS

S & LEHRMAN P L ■ EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 PHOTO 16 0 On behal of Jane s I through t 1 ) PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 JEGE, INC., 24 ADAM D. HOROWITZ. ESQUIRE PASSENGER MANIFEST W1TZ. P A 16 PLAINTIFFS EX. 3 HYPERION AIR, INC., 15 PASSENGER MANIFEST ■ PLAINTIFF'S EX. 6 PHOTO 63 I PLAINTI

eben, Jonathan Goldman Ce- darbaurn, Jessie Acker Allen, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Paula Ca

e 101 v. Epstein Page 7 Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL 3 160 Fax: ssmasexabuseattomev.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Re