Epstein Secrets

KER,CHARLES E KAYE,WILLIAM A LEVINE,TERRY BOCKMANN,MARIA K CLOUTIER,GEORGE A

QUINN,OLIVER H LOCKER,NANCY OWEN,JANE D CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD KELLER,MICHAEL

ivileged e-malls, and I assume It 0 KS. ROCKEIMACH: Your Honor, I can give you 10 probably is, your Honor has entered an order 10 the copy that Terry noted was 04408. I don't need II sealing these documents, and the prose la present. 11 it. 12 It is being displayed pronlnently in violation of

RE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it clear to all parties that 10 12 exhibits that. here net disclosed by the end of II For Non-Parties L.M., E.M. 4 Jana Doe 22 1a Deoabor -- and I think it nay have been the 14 De her 22 dace -- I'm not sure about that exact 13 la date -- but exhibits that were no

ivileged e-malls, and I assume It 0 KS. ROCKEIMACH: Your Honor, I can give you 10 probably is, your Honor has entered an order 10 the copy that Terry noted was 04408. I don't need II sealing these documents, and the prose la present. 11 it. 12 It is being displayed pronlnently in violation of

question in front of you sight now is • very brief, representing three victims; LH, EM and • what to do about this. Well, we knee one thing. • Jane Doe. /Vat ono housekeeping natter. s lie know there's been absolutely no waiver of 10 No have riled a notion to intervene, which is 10 attorney/cl

47 1 A. They were -- They were generated, but I 2 don't know, you know, why - what the particular 3 reasoning was for it. 4 0. Do you know if Terry (sic) Staley would have 5 been the one to forward those flight logs to the FAA? 6 A. No. no. no. I -- They were all just for 7 business use - n

t Las OHS 130.40Velt1 5 Page S41[91650 ran Lo, ie. FL 31394 6 DIRECT EXAMINATION By Mr. Edwards #5 7 CROSS-EXAMINATION On betel d Planter Jane Doe 2 through s By Ms. Ezell *190 T mERUELSTE1N 6 HOROWITZ. PA 9 CROSS-EXAMINATION By Mr. Willits #195 10 BY: JESSICA D. ARBOUR. ATTORMEY.AT4AW.

B1.2(a); United States Saavedra, 148 3d 1311, 1316-18 (11th Cir.1998); United States Hornsby, F.3d 336, 338-39 (5th Cir.1996); nited States ■ Terry, 86 F.3d 353, 357-78 (4th Cir.I996). Others look beyond such documents to examine the defendant's il proven relevant conduct. Nichols, 1 F.3d at

s. To inform Jane Doe of dates that he had arranged, Evans called Jane Doe on a cellular telephone that she had acquired from him. Evans also gave Jane Doe's cellular telephone number to customers and told Jane Doe to arrange dates when customers called. During the dates, Ev- ans called Jane Doe on the