3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
multiple reasons. 1. Epstein is Not a Privilege Holder and Thus is Not Covered by Perlman. 14 EFTA002
ICTION TO ENTERTAIN EPSTEIN'S INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF THE DISTRICT COURT'S DISCOVERY ORDER DIRECTED TO THE GOVERNMENT. 10 A. The Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Mohawk Makes Clear that Privilege Rulings During Discovery are Not Immediately Appealable But Instead Must be Challenged (If Necessary) at the C
multiple reasons. 1. Epstein is Not a Privilege Holder and Thus is Not Covered by Perlman. 14 EFTA002
ICTION TO ENTERTAIN EPSTEIN'S INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF THE DISTRICT COURT'S DISCOVERY ORDER DIRECTED TO THE GOVERNMENT. 10 A. The Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Mohawk Makes Clear that Privilege Rulings During Discovery are Not Immediately Appealable But Instead Must be Challenged (If Necessary) at the C
/2013 Page 5 of 16 1. Epstein is Not a Privilege Holder. The first hurdle that Epstein cannot clear is t
ignore recent controlling caselaw from the Supreme Court, which makes clear that an interlocutory appeal is not permitted. A. The Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Mohawk That Attorney-Client Privilege Rulings are Not Immediately Appealable Limits the Perlman Doctrine to Non-Litigants in a Case. Contrary t
Entities connected to both Eric Holder and Recent Decision

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Michael Cohen
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONRoy Black
PERSONFISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Carpenter
PERSON
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION
Howell
PERSON