Epstein Secrets

Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 we also issued OLY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11 12 April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were 13 served. 14

orroborate the statement such as petty cash receipts from one of the house managers where he is documented paying Jane Doe Number 14, as well as a Western Union transaction that occurred at Christmas where Mr. Epstein provided Jane Doe Number 14 with $200 as a Christmas present. Q All right. Referring to

e known as Chase, not J.P. Morgan Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was taken care of on March 22, '07. We also issued OLY-40 on Chase Bank as well on April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were served. Q And those so

14 Services seeking documents and records related to Jeffrey 15 Epstein. It was served on February 26, 2007, and we 16 received items back from Western Union on two separate 17 dates, and two packages, the first on April 9, 2007, and 18 the second on April 11, 2007. 19 Q And those sought records of

14 Services seeking documents and records related to Jeffrey 15 Epstein. It was served on February 26, 2007, and we 16 received items back from western Union on two separate 17 dates, and two packages, the first on April 9, 2007, and 18 the second on April 11, 2007. 19 Q And those sought records of

14 Services seeking documents and records related to Jeffrey 15 Epstein. It was served on February 26, 2007, and we 16 received items back from western Union on two separate 17 dates, and two packages, the first on April 9, 2007, and 18 the second on April 11, 2007. 19 Q And those sought records of

d 0LY-32 to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank. 6 After serving that one on February 26, 2007, they informed 7 us by letter that they are known as Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11

d 0LY-32 to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank. 6 After serving that one on February 26, 2007, they informed 7 us by letter that they are known as Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11

d 0LY-32 to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank. 6 After serving that one on February 26, 2007, they informed 7 us by letter that they are known as Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11

Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11 12 April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were 13 served. 14

Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11 12 April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were 13 served. 14

Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11 12 April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were 13 served. 14