Epstein Secrets

ct court properly assumed to be true in ruling on Epstein's pre-trial motion.' The Epstein Investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation into allegations that Epstein had been sexually abusing underage girls over the proceeding five years. The United States At

y involved in plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." CVRA Petition, DE 1 at 3. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe No. 1 asserted a violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federa

ct court properly assumed to be true in ruling on Epstein's pre-trial motion.' The Epstein Investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation into allegations that Epstein had been sexually abusing underage girls over the proceeding five years. The United States At

y involved in plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." CVRA Petition, DE 1 at 3. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe No. 1 asserted a violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federa

es against Epstein which had been EFTA00177793 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 2 of 14 investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) 1 in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida and (2) refrain from instituting criminal charges against certain alleged co-conspirators o

was currently involved in plea negotiations with the USAO/SDFL, which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." [CVRA Petition, DE 1, 13]. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe 1 asserted the violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federal