Epstein Secrets

listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation's determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United St

state "Dispute Resolution Services: Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. Sincerely, Michael G. Seidel Section Chief, Record/Information Dissemination Section Information Management Division Endosure(s) EFTA00175091 FBI FOIPA Addendum As refer

R ONLINE LLC and JAMES ROBERSON, Plaintiffs, -v- 17 Civ. 3956 (PGG) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor New York, Y rk

cier Jeffrey Epstein, who plead guilty to one count of felony solicitation of prostitution in August 2006. Dkt. No. 12-2, Ex. B; see Declaration of Michael G. Seidel, dated June 2021 ("Seidel Decl.") 1 6, Ex. A. By letter dated April 28, 2017, the FBI acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff's FOIA request, and that b

ecords in preparation for the prosecution or review of samples of all of the categories of documents, I am familiar with the responsive records that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") has withheld pursuant to Exemptions 3, 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(D), and 7(E) of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5)-(7). In addition, I am familiar with t

e FOIA requests withheld in full or in part under Exemption 7(A), including those reflected on the index prepared by the FBI and the declaration of Michael G. Seidel (the "FBI index"). All of these records fall within the scope of Exemption 7(A). 11. Public disclosure of the records withheld in full or in part

s an online investigative news outlet and Plaintiff Robertson is one of its senior editors. (Id. ¶¶ 2-3) Plaintiffs submitted their FOIA request to the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") on April 20, 2017. (Id.¶ 10) Plaintiffs received no response, and filed this action on May 25, 2017. (Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 1)) The Amended Comp

in the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. (Third Comey Decl. (Dkt. No. 59)1 1), and a revised declaration from Michael G. Seidel, the Section Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section ("RIDS") of the FBI's Information Management Division ("IMD"). (Second Seidel De

at 3) "[T]he record establishes that the release of the requested information could reasonably be expected to cause articulable harm." Cui v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation 551 F. Supp. 3d 4, 24 (E.D.N.Y. 2021) This Court concludes that "[t]he [revised] declarations provide[] sufficient detail for the Court to trace a