Epstein Secrets

ruling on the issue of probable cause, and an opportunity for the parties to be heard at oral argument on this motion. TONJA ET AL. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 25 EFTA00799363 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . • Atterbury,

on this motion. TONJA ET AL. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 25 EFTA0079

e of probable cause is measured by an objective standard, not based on an officer's underlying intent or subjective 21 EFTA00799359 motivation." Hernandez v. State, 784 So.2d at 1128 (quoting State v. T.P., 588 So. 2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)). Accordingly, "[t]he principal components of a determination of

to be heard at oral argument regarding any assertions by Edwards attempting to refute the existence of probable cause. TONJA ET AL. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, P

probable cause. TONJA ET AL. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Be

e of probable cause is measured by an objective standard, not based on an officer's underlying intent or subjective 25 EFTA00583976 motivation." Hernandez v. State, 784 So.2d at 1128 (quoting State v. T.P., 588 So. 2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)). Accordingly, "[t]he principal components of a determination of

RVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Be

neys for Epstein 24 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585443 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . Atte ury, o erger, c Weiss, PA 2

.2d 1205, 1213-14 (Fla. 1980) (holding improper a question of a witness which sought "to elicit the individual and personal view of the witness."); Hernandez v. State, 575 So.2d 1321, 1322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holding that it was reversible error to admit testimony of police officers and teacher that sexual abuse