Epstein Secrets

rmed made clear that any violation in respect to Epstein was the result of Fowler White's wrongdoing. The dispute arises from what Edwards' counsel Jack Scaroia described Friday as the "extraordinary circumstance" surrounding the November 2010 order. Concerned about the expenses of responding to a subpoena

m Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. EFTA00805053 Scarola noted during Friday's hearing that Farmer Jaffe and Edwards have contended that the documents encompassed both attorney-client privileged informatio

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Editing by Adam LoBelia. EFTA00805054

ida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A). /s/ David P. Vitale Jr. Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: jsrasearcylaw.com; and [email protected] Primary E-M

al Rule 2090-1(A). /s/ David P. Vitale Jr. Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr. F

v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit") to the RRA trustee, were 1 EFTA00808140 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6382 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 7 to be print

s, and this avoided the cost of dealing with over 70,000 emails — a cost that could not be advanced by Rothstein's bankrupt firm, Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney told Law360 on Monday. "The strong language in the order was considered adequate protection to preserve the confidentiality of the

nney told Law360 on Monday. "The strong language in the order was considered adequate protection to preserve the confidentiality of the documents," Scarola said. In its motion, Farmer Jaffe also asks U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond A. Ray to allow it to conduct extensive discovery, including holding an e

he U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800)COCX MB AG, in the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida. —Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Jill Coffey. View commen

from their real concern that the emails will be unsealed and Edwards' case against Epstein will be eviscerated." EFTA00793966 Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA said that it is Epstein who is trying to "hide behind a curtain of distortions and distractions." "V

court order is apparently no big deal to someone who has managed to evade justice for as long as Epstein has, and his response is evidence of that," Scarola said. "However, the day of reckoning will not be delayed much longer. An attorney for Fowler White did not respond to a request for comment Monday.

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Additional reporting by Nathan Hale. Editing by Edrienne Su. Update: This story has

stances concerning the theft of privileged documents that found their way into the hands of a convicted billionaire child abuser," Edwards' counsel Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA said Friday. Farmer Jaffe said In Its March 19 sanctions motion that recent developments in ongoing

billionaire child abuser," Edwards' counsel Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA sa

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, In the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Bruce Goldman. AI Content 6 200

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES: ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF(S): SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. By: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT(S): TiN A HADDAD P A By: TONYA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE Palm Beach

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES: ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF(S): SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. By: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT(S): TiN A HADDAD P A By: TONYA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. EFTA00610184 3

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). /

iss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr., Esq. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: [email protected]; and [email protected]

61)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale,

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("

da Bar No.: 132896 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARD FIT LEHRMAN P.L. 16 EFTA00708308 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 0410811 Page 17 of 23 Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards in the matter of Epstein v. Edwards, et at Ca

T LEHRMAN P.L. 16 EFTA00708308 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 0410811 Page 17 of 23 Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards in the matter of Epstein v. Edwards, et at Case No.: 502009C40408000CCaMBAG 17 EFTA00708309

leged that Rothstein had engaged in a fraud against him. Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (Cir. Ct. of the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, FL). 24. and Edwards answered the complaint, denying all allegations against them and