Epstein Secrets

24 25 Page 5 this case, who is the one who would be asserting the privilege. Mr. Edwards, as I understand it, is representing himself. Actually, Jack Scarola is his attorney. I've had a chance to review the documents. I've printed them out and reviewed them. Just to place things in its context, the sta

tand it, is representing himself. Actually, Jack Scarola is his attorney. I've had a chance to review th

ause if the trustee believed that -- THE COURT: There's no litigation pending. MR. FARMER: That we -- Edwards and LM have not been sued -- I mean, Lichtman's been sued, Adler. People have been brought in by the trustee because they've found evidence that they believe constitutes some wrongful conduct,

nts are held by the trustee now, and so Mr. Stettin was concerned that there may be some privilege issues on those documents, and as a result, Mr. Lichtman and the attorneys came forward before this Court and requested that there be a master appointed to help resolve this issue, and ultimately, I beca

evard, Suite West Palm Beach, FL 33401 301 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 5 By JENNIFER LETTMAN, ESQUIRE 6 For Bradley Edwards: 7 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 10 For Farmer Jaffe: 11 ED

6 For Bradley Edwards: 7 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 10 For Farmer Jaffe: 11 EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC 12 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 13 By Bradley Edwards, Esq

f communications on the next page purporting to have occurred November 12, 2010? A To make sure we're on the same one, that's the email from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney and Mr. Farmer. Q There are two emails: one from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney, and one from Judge Carney to Gary Farmer. A Yes

AD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shiolev 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Bouleva

2009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman, Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as

M Jack Patrick Hill [COR LD Nit] Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Bouleva

009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman. Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as