Epstein Secrets

rcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- Shipley, 80469 2139 Palm Beach Lake

561-832-7137 F [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola

s a right, not a mere privilege. This right is available at the taking of depositions as well as during the examination of witnesses at trial." See Anderson v. Snyder, 91 Conn. 404, 408, 99 A. 1032 (1917); Helfferich v. Farley, 36 Conn.Sup. 333,334,419 A.2d 913 (1980). Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Documen

ue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax:

ted Case No. 08- 80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt A

he examination of witnesses at trial." Accordingly, Plaintiffs request that Epstein be prevented from attending her deposition should be denied. See Anderson v. Snyder, 91 Conn. 404,408, 99 A. 1032 (1917); Helfferich v. Farley, 36 Conn.Sup. 333,334, 419 A.2d 913 (1980). If this Court excludes Defendant f

4 Datura Street, Suite 900 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 322 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2009 Page 12 of 13 Page 12 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300

Page 12 of 13 Page 12 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola

ccordingly, Plaintiffs request that Epstein be prevented from attending her deposition and that a special master be appointed should be denied. See Anderson v. Snyder, 91 Conn. 404, 408, 99 A. 1032 (1917); Helfferich v. Farley, 36 Conn.Sup. 333, 334, 419 A.2d 913 (1980). If this Court excludes Defendant

ives the privilege. United States v. Jones, 696 F.2d 1069, 1072 (4th Cir. 1982). The general rule applies here. On March 8, 2018, Edwards' counsel, Jack Scarola, implied (incorrectly) that the e-mails were shared with Epstein's counsel by Mr. Scherer, counsel for Razorback. Thus, Edwards admits that he volu

es here. On March 8, 2018, Edwards' counsel, Jack Scarola, implied (incorrectly) that the e-mails were sha

Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The privilege "cannot prevent the disclosure of communications made in contemplation of a crime or the perpetration of a fraud." Anderson v. State, 297 So. 2d 871, 875 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). The privilege ceases to exist where desired legal advice "refers not to prior wrongdoing, but to

224 Datura Street, Suite 900 ch, FL 33401 Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Scatty Denney Scarola

aka City, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 08- Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 ch, FL 33401 Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Scatty Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Counsel for P

1994, when confronted with in- formation indicating his representations relating to DCC were false, Hoffenberg told Nardello that his attorneys at Anderson, Kill, Olick & Oshinsky ("Anderson Kill") had built a figurative "Chinese Wall" between him and Lowy at the Long Island office to ensure that Hoff

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 9 of 19 I and Jane Doe 2. Ile and his own lawyer in a related state case, Jack Scarola, have been widely quoted by local and British press, making prejudicial and inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence betwee

nd inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence between the defense team and the government is not kept confidential, attorneys Scarola and Edwards could reasonably be expected to continue disseminating out-of-court publicity and making extrajudicial statements and commentary to the

apply not only to references to unindicted co-conspirators in indictments and factual proffers, but also to motion papers. See, e.g., United States" Anderson, 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999) ("After carefully reviewing the government's moving papers on the conflict of interest jssuc, the court c

Z, P:A. 1-5 18205iBiscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 Miami, Fldrida:33160 16 .17 APPEARING ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF C.A.. 18 JACK.HILU.ESQ: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, RA 19 - 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 20 21. APPEARING ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF: 22 ISIDRO GARCIA

MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ. P.A. 15 18205(Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 2218 16 17 APPEARING ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF: C.A. 18 JACK. HILL,ESQ. SEARCY. DENNEY, SGAROLA. BARNHART & SHIPLEY. P.A 19 2139' Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach. Florida 33409 20 21 APPEARING ON BEHALF OE PLAINTIFF: 22 ISIDRO .GARCIA

tely three weeks abroad. Extensive international travel of this nature further demonstrates a significant risk of flight. See, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp. 2d 32, 36 (D.D.C. 2005). There can be no assurance that, upon release, the defendant would suddenly lack access to such means of travel

ve been retained by the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA. to provide expert analys

Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2012), p.1- 10. 26-30 October. Baltimore, MD. Carman, S., Strong, R., Chandra, A.., Oh, S., Spangler, S., Anderson, and Jansen, B.J. (2012) Predictive Value of Comments in the Service Engagement Process. 75th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Informati

s Administrator www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615804 335 337 1 APPEARANCES: 1 I N D EX 2 2 On behalf of Plaintiffs: 3 3 SEARCY. DENNEY. SCAROLA Examination Page 4 4 5 VOLUME 3 (Pages 334 - 461) 5 6 6 7 ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ 7 8 Direct (continued) By Mr. Edwards 341 a On behalf of

414:12 443:13 343:13 353:14 446:25 449:1 and/or (1) 451:25 452:19 456:17 403:13416:10 450:22,25 452:8 453:10,13 416:22 428:8 453:10 458:9 Anderson (1) answered (16) www.phi s rting.com EFTA00615837 2 357:23 14 363:25 379:3 382:20,22,25 409:10,14 April (4) 337:16 368:3,11 388:7 ar