Epstein Secrets

ubx YES iN COMPLAINT O UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 complaint: JURY DEMAND: . go NO Vill. RELATED (See Instructions): (SEE ATTACHED) : CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein 3-W-O*€ SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR OF

(SEE ATTACHED) : CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe

d that we use retired llth Circuit Judge Joseph Hatchett instead of Judge Davis because of Judge Davis's heaith problems. (No one has contacted Judge Hatchett yet, but one of the District Judges in Miami mentioned him as a good choice.) I am available for a conference call between 9:00 and 10:00, and betwe

he is transferring them to. Cf. Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Co-op Corp. v. Prime One Capital Co., L.L.C., 2007 WL 4482611 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (Marra, J.) (refusing to 15 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 16 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON

n direct evidence, and, in some cases is even more reliable."' United States v. Ranum, 96 F.3d 1020, 1026 (7th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Hatchett, 31 F.3d 1411, 1421 (7th Cir. 1994 )). For all these reasons, the Court should conclude that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. 11 C

he is transferring them to. Cf. Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Co-op Corp. v. Prime One Capital Co., L.L.C., 2007 WL 4482611 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (Marra, J.) (refusing to 15 EFTA00234885 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 16 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MA

n direct evidence, and, in some cases is even more reliable.'" United States v. Ranum, 96 F.3d 1020, 1026 (7th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Hatchett, 31 F.3d 1411, 1421 (7th Cir. 1994)). For all these reasons, the Court should conclude that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. 11 EFTA

ible (Motion in Limine 18) oo. eeeesseesseceseesseesseceseesseesseceseesseeeseeeseeessesseessaeeseecseeesaeesaecsseesseeseeeeeeseessees 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19)... eee 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with R

eeseecseeesaeesaecsseesseeseeeeeeseessees 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Li

7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) oo. ceiceeccssseeseceseesseeeseesseeeeecseessaeeseeesneeees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir, 1990) oo. eee ceeeesseeseeeseeeseeeseesseeeseeenaeeees 22 United States v. Lujan, No. 05—CR-924 (RB) (D.N.M. Mar. 25, 20

and admissible (Motion in Limine 18) ooo... cecccecccccccccesscececsseececsseeeceseescesseesssueescnsssescesseessesssesensseeesssaeeess 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19).................00. 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s convers

sueescnsssescesseessesssesensseeesssaeeess 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Li

7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) o.oo ccecccecccccccceccceesccessscssseecneeeesstecsseeenees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir. 1990) oo... cccccc cee ceececeeeeeseeessesenees 22 United States v. Lujan, No. 05—CR—-924 (RB) (D.N.M. Mar. 25, 2011) ..