Epstein Secrets

14 Let me turn then to point number 19. Here again, we 15 have a narrow issue presented to your Honor. We are asking 16 that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. 17 As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case 18 was when Ms. then known as Jane Doe Number

o your Honor. We are asking 16 that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. 17 As your Hono

e to say about this? And we 16 haven't been in a position to be able to do that. 17 So your Honor, for all those reasons we believe that 18 Mr. Freeh should be excluded, the FOIA letter should not come 19 into evidence, and again, we believe that the issue of 20 Mr. Clinton should not be an iss

you already. Let me turn then to point number 19. Here again, we have a narrow issue presented to your Honor. We are asking that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case was when Ms. Giuffre, then known as Jane Doe Number 3,

ed to your Honor. We are asking that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. As your Honor is

does he have to say about this? And we haven't been in a position to be able to do that. So your Honor, for all those reasons we believe that Mr. Freeh should b xcluded, the FOIA letter should not come into evidence, and again, we believe that the issue of Mr. Clinton should not be an issue relevant

by the federal government to this request, and his knowledge of the duties, protocols and operations of security provided to a former President, Mr. Freeh opines in the attached letter that the absence of such records “strongly establishes that former President Clinton was not present on Little St. Jame

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, VS. U