Epstein Secrets

mpiani & Vargas, P.A. (appellate counsel for petitioner) Spencer T. Kuvin of Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. (counsel for non-party intervener,..) Honorable Kenneth A. Marra (judge, Southern District of Florida) Palm Beach Newspapers d/b/a The Palm Beach Post (non-party intervener) Deanna K. Shullman of Thomas, Locic

rcement of Crime Victim's Rights Acts (A-1)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respon

w her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Governm

ifies — his purported co-conspirators — were before the Court, they would have no privacy interest in matters pertaining to their criminal conduct. Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc.,. Doe, 612 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1992) (Does, whose names were implicated in criminal prostitution scheme, had no right to priva

rcement of Crime Victim's Rights Acts (A-I)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respon

ORIDA JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, I JUNE 12, 2009 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, I Defendant. 11 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPEARANCES: 13 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Mermelstein & Horowitz 15 16 For Jane Doe

w her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Governm

ifies — his purported co-conspirators — were before the Court, they would have no privacy interest in matters pertaining to their criminal conduct. Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc.'. Doe, 612 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1992) (Does, whose names were implicated in criminal prostitution scheme, had no right to priva

rcement of Crime Victim's Rights Acts (A-I)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respon

w her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Governm

tifies —his purported co-conspirators — were before the Court, they would have no privacy interest in matters pertaining to their criminal conduct. Post-Newsweek Stations. Florida. Inc. v. Doe, 612 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1992) (Does, whose names were implicated in criminal prostitution scheme, had no right to priv