Epstein Secrets

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disclosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court wil

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disdosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court will

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

7NG SERVICE, INC. . - 7 S11,17i-i995 1431Sel'OnlileicliRep—mtinie.ac EFTA00617921 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 case is pending before Judge Marra. And one of the threshold issues in that case was whether victims rights attach prior to the filing of a federal indictment. And Judge Marra ruled

0 11 12 13 14 15 16 case is pending before Judge Marra. And one of the threshold issues in that case wa

00617917 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Schwartzle versus Publix Super Markets is a case in which the appellate court, the Fourth DCA, was asked to address the issue of the inclusion of a confidentiality provision in a proposal for settlement. What that opinion says is -- and thi

being taken advantage of. Taken advantage of through the forging of an order -- forging of an order that purported to have the signature of Judge Marra -- a tremendously well-respected jurist in this community, now taken senior status. I, meaning Mr. Epstein, was not only concerned about Rothstei

an order that purported to have the signature of Judge Marra -- a tremendously well-respected jurist in this

se Fifth Amendment questions that were asked of my client -- THE COURT: No probative value. MS. ROCKENBACH: No probative value. And the Frazier -- the Fourth DCA says that even that adverse inference against parties when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them. If my c