5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
15 / 5
Mentions
ourt entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipulation (D.E. #207) and Order thereo
DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 N EFTA00206525
nd closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
ourt entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipulation (D.E. #207) and Order thereo
DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 N EFTA00212198
nd closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
ourt entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipulation (D.E. #207) and Order thereo
DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 N EFTA00222326
nd closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[t]he Court shall retain jurisdiction to
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
ourt entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[tie Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipulation (D.E. #207) and Order thereon
s January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. C7I -71tS ) 7S c't LINNEA R. JO N UNITED STAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 EFTA00612481
nd closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[tie Court shall retain jurisdiction to e
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
ourt entered a Final Order in the above-captioned case dismissing the action with prejudice and closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[tie Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement and the joint stipulation (D.E. #207) and Order thereon
s January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. C7I -71tS ) 7S c't LINNEA R. JO N UNITED STAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 EFTA00615542
nd closing the case. (D.E. #211). In said Order, Judge Marra stated "[tie Court shall retain jurisdiction to e
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
Entities connected to both Kenneth Marra and the Internal Justice Department

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONScott Rothstein
PERSONChambers
PERSON
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATIONJANE DOE NO
PERSOND.E.
ORGANIZATIONJustice Department Complaint
ORGANIZATIONthe State Court
ORGANIZATIONLINNEA
ORGANIZATIONChmielarz
PERSONthe Florida Rules of Evidence
ORGANIZATIONthe Final Judgment
ORGANIZATIONSee American Disability Assn.
ORGANIZATIONR. JOHN
PERSONEpstein I. Rothstein
PERSONinternal Justice Department Proceeding
ORGANIZATION