Document Mentions (6 shared documents)

EFTA00776366

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

r, basically, a freeze order. Mr. Edwards, 16 on behalf of two of his Jane Does, tried to get 17 that order so it would become public. Judge 18 Marra said, no, and they keep trying and trying 19 and trying, but that's another issue. I did 20 raise that with you, and I believe Mr. Kuvin was 21

itself, but I trust that all of the cases before Judge Marra, all the cases that are before me in state court

lly speaks to 24 that at length where the cause of action was 25 delineated and discussed fully - I think goes EFTA00776413 49 1 back to the McCarson case and then its prodigy, 2 but to prove a claim for intentional infliction 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Court that, within the bounds of reasonablen

EFTA00175521

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Doe v. Epstein et al Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson ' Case in other court: 15th Judicial Circuit, 50 2008 CA 006596 Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question

e v. Epstein et al Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson

haracterized by 'malice,' or a degree of aggravation which would entitle the plaintiff to punitive damages for another tort."' Metro. Life Ins. Co.' McCarson, 467 So. 2d 277, 278 (Fla. 1985) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 (1965)). Rather, "the conduct as a matter of law must be so outrageous

EFTA00234224

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1,

f mental suffering; (2) outrageous conduct; (3) the conduct caused the emotional distress; and (4) the distress was severe. Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. McCarson, 467 So. 2d 277, 278 (Fla. 1985). Whether conduct is outrageous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a ques