Epstein Secrets

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

jurisdiction] by looking to matters outside the pleadings, and we do not accord any presumptive truthfulness to the allegations in the complaint.”): Scarfo v. Ginsberg, 175 F.3d 957, 960-61 (1 I th Cir. 1999). 2 Although Petitioners also fail to satisfy the first and second prongs of the standing test, 2 EFTA002

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

jurisdiction] by looking to matters outside the pleadings, and we do not accord any presumptive truthfulness to the allegations in the complaint."); Scarfo v. Ginsberg, 175 F.3d 957, 960-61 (11th Cir. 1999). 2 Although Petitioners also fail to satisfy the first and second prongs of the standing test, 2 EFTA00208

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

jurisdiction] by looking to matters outside the pleadings, and we do not accord any presumptive truthfulness to the allegations in the complaint."); Scarfo v. Ginsberg, 175 F.3d 957, 960-61 (11th Cir. 1999). 2 Although Petitioners also fail to satisfy the first and second prongs of the standing test, 2 EFTA00795

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

jurisdiction] by looking to matters outside the pleadings, and we do not accord any presumptive truthfulness to the allegations in the complaint."); Scarfo v. Ginsberg, 175 F.3d 957, 960-61 (11th Cir. 1999). 2 Although Petitioners also fail to satisfy the first and second prongs of the standing test, 2 EFTA00799