Epstein Secrets

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I UNITED S

U.S. Attorney Lee) that the United States "does not oppose the Motion to intervene." The victims wish to report (likewise based on discussion with AUSA Lee) that the United States does not support the motion to intervene. The United States believes that this issue is a fight between the victims and in

es: The most recent court decision to carefully review the Justice Department's position is Jane Does #1 and #2 v. United States, No. 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON (S.D. Fla. Sept. 26, 2011). In that case, the court flatly rejected the Department's claim that rights attach only after charges are formall

f] procured additional young women for Mr. Epstein and [was] paid commissions or referral fees for it." Hrng. Tr. (Nov. 23, 2015) at 4 (statement of AUSA Lee). The Government later backed off from this assertion, perhaps recognizing that its "blame-the-victim" strategy conflicted with the Justice Departm

I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of

me. I immediately documented this conversation and informed the U.S. Attorney who informed Senior Litigation Counsel and Ethics Advisor Dexter Lee. AUSA Lee opined that he did not see a conflict. 3. The Alleged Unprecedented Extension of Federal Law. It is my hope that this letter has sufficiently expl

ageiee ted Feb 1a ge 2 date. 1353 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014715 EFTA00225177 U.S. Department of Just

me. I immediately documented this conversation and informed the U.S. Attorney who informed Senior Litigation Counsel and Ethics Advisor Dexter Lee. AUSA Lee opined that he did not see a conflict. As soon as I -became aware of these allegations, 1 reported myself to the Office of Professional Regulation

draft letter to DAG EXHIBIT B-I27 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00225328 U.S. Department of

me. I immediately documented this conversation and informed the U.S. Attorney who informed Senior Litigation Counsel and Ethics Advisor Dexter Lee. AUSA Lee opined that he did not see a conflict. 3. The Alleged Unprecedented Extension of Federal Law. It is my hope that this letter has sufficiently expl

nior, Robert (USAFLS) please review 08-80736-CV-MARRA se EXHIBIT B-128 P-014955 EFTA00225342 U.S.

tion and informed the U.S. Attorney who 08-80736-W-MARRA P-014967 EFTA00225354 informed Senior Litigation Counsel and Ethics Advisor Dexter Lee. AUSA Lee opined that he did not see a conflict. As soon as became aware of these allegations, reported myself to the Office of Professional Regulation on or

gotiations? Tracking: 268 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013329 EFTA00230234 LIM° 7 1Xiskat,olh /2)

me. I immediately documented this conversation and informed the U.S. Attorney who informed Senior Litigation Counsel and Ethics Advisor Dexter Lee. AUSA Lee opined that he did not see a conflict. As soon as I -became aware of these allegations, I reported myself to the Office of Professional Regulation