Epstein Secrets

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, VS.

ers and memos in which Mr. Epstein's counsel addressed the reasons why Mr. Epstein should not be federally prosecuted. 8 EFTA00177817 States v. Adelman, 458 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2006), also involved statements made by the defendant to federal prosecutors; the defendant's statements were made in meetin

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

ve no room to doubt that the parties were engaged in serious negotiations to resolve the federal criminal investigation of Epstein. United States v. Adelman, 458 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2006), also involved statements made by the defendant to federal prosecutors; the defendant's statements were made in meeti

ith it. See Jane Doe #2 v. Epstein, No. 08-80119-MARRA, Doc. 462. Once the CVRA action was re-activated

ral court and "comparable state procedures." Fed. R. ' The other two cases relied on by the district court are equally inapposite. United States v. Adelman, 458 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2006), involved statements made by the defendant to federal prosecutors during meetings at which she was told, according to

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

ve no room to doubt that the parties were engaged in serious negotiations to resolve the federal criminal investigation of Epstein. United States v. Adelman, 458 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2006), also involved statements made by the defendant to federal prosecutors; the defendant's statements were made in meeti