Epstein Secrets

ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. Winn LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

including Plaintiffs' past and present psychological, familial and social histories is reasonable and shall not be denied.4 3 Plaintiff, Andriano's First Am. Compl., Counts l - XXX. 4 The Court notes that in reaching the within conclusion, review and consideration was made of the various declarations fi

NE AND ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

including Plaintiffs' past and present psychological, familial and social histories is reasonable and shall not be denied.4 3 Plaintiff, Andriano's First Am. Compl., Counts l-XXX. 4 The Court notes that in reaching the within conclusion, review and consideration was made of the various declarations file

); sM, (USAFLS)' We will shortly be filing a motion to compel Government responses to our discovery requests -- discovery which, as you know, Judge Marra has already ordered. We realize, of course, that the Government has filed a motion to dismiss/stay. But if the Government's position is rejected on

scovery requests -- discovery which, as you know, Judge Marra has already ordered. We realize, of course, that

Subject: Jane Doe litigation Can you confirm that the plaintiffs in the cases cited below are the petitioners in our CVRA matter? EFTA00206131 First Am. Compl. ¶11132-33, Doet Epstein, Case No. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA cassert[ing] a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to [18

ite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); see also, e.g., Blinco, 400 F.3d at 1312; AVVA-BC, 25 So.

1 EFTA00081026 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 13 of 101 23, 2008) (attached as Exhibit D) see also First Am. Comp111 32-33, Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA (S.D. Fla.) ("assert[ing] a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pur