60 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992). Wilson I. EFTA00210756 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 286 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2015 Page 2 of 2 Am. Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 1570 (11th Cir. 1985). DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 14ih day of January, 2015.

60 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992)• Wilson v. EFTA00607363 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 286 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2015 Page 2 of 2 Am. Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 1570 (11th Cir. 1985). DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 14ih day of January, 2015.

352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). The burden is on the party seeking the protective order to demonstrate good cause for its issuance. See Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp. 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Chu

1, 14 United States v. Erie Cniy., 763 F.3d 235 (2d Cir. 2014) 14 United States v. Samar, 471 F. Supp. 2d 380 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) 11 Wilson v. Am. Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1985) 8 OTHER AUTHORITIES Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 1, 7 iii EFTA00805410 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 936 Filed 04/06

352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). The burden is on the party seeking the protective order to demonstrate good cause for its issuance. See Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp. 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re /went Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Chu