Epstein Secrets

tz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

om a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

r, 94 F.3d 198, 199 (6th Cir. 1996), and "historically settlement techniques are closed procedures rather than open." Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. General Elec. Co., 854 F.2d 900, 903-04 (6th 2 The CVRA itself provides that a "person accused of the crime may not obtain any form of relief under this chapter." 18

itz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA] was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

hom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

rer, 94 F.3d 198, 199 (6th Cir. 1996), and "historically settlement techniques are closed procedures rather than open." Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co.'. General Elec. Co., 854 F.2d 900, 903-04 (6th Cir. 1988). In both of those cases, the press sought access to pre-trial settlement 2 The CVRA itself provides that a "

tz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

om a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

er, 94 F.3d 198, 199 (6th Cir. 1996), and "historically settlement techniques are closed procedures rather than open." Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co.'. General Elec. Co., 854 F.2d 900, 903-04 (6th 2 The CVRA itself provides that a "person accused of the crime may not obtain any form of relief under this chapter." 18

itz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

hom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

rer, 94 F.3d 198, 199 (6th Cir. 1996), and "historically settlement techniques are closed procedures rather than open." Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co.. General Elec. Co., 854 F.2d 900, 903-04 (6th Cir. 1988). In both of those cases, the press sought access to pit-trial settlement procedures, asserting a First Amendm