Epstein Secrets

tz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

om a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00644730 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016

tz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

om a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00211535 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016

itz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

hom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court. Doe No. 1, supra, 749 F.3d 999. Thus, Eps