Epstein Secrets

tz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

om a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion

itz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA] was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

hom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DE159). Epstein's motio

tz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

om a remedy is appropriate" (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion

itz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the [CVRA) was violated and if so, against whom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited intervention to "assert[] a claim that the documents in question may be privileged" (DE158 at 1-2).

hom a remedy is appropriate (DE56 at 5). District Judge Marra granted the attorneys' motion, allowing limited

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Leflcowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI59). Epstein's motion

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs,

y /S/ ROY BLACK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 126088 JACKIE PERCZEK, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0042201 On Behalf of Limited Intervenors Jeffrey Epstein And Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz 4 EFTA00208184