Epstein Secrets

as signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10,

of the agents and myself the matter was, in fact, "currently under investigation." The NPA was signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10, 2008 and May 30, 2008. During the period that the letters were sent, Epstein was asserting that: (a

ms' Rights and Restitution Act, and other pieces r victims' rights legislation, primarily from two prior cases that I had handled. In United States O'Neil, I had litigated the Office's first case where a defendant objected to a victim impact statement. It was a case where a 41-year-old man gave a leth

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

ation is timely." United States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (11th Cir. 1983). "'Timeliness' is not precisely measurable," Brown ex reL O'Neil v. Bush, 194 Fed. Appx. 879, 882 (11th Cir. 2006), and is "not limited to chronological considerations but is to be determined from all the circumst

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

ited States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (1 1 th Cir. 1983). "'Timeliness' is not precisely measurable," 2 EFTA00583796 Brown a rel. O'Neil v. Bush, 194 Fed. Appx. 879, 882 (11th Cir. 2006), and is "not limited to chronological considerations but is to be determined from all the circumst