Epstein Secrets

1993) 13 Jane Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-cv-80893-Marra (United States District Court S.D. Fla. 2008) 4

y News filed a motion to quash, claiming that the tape recording is somehow protected by a journalist's privilege. In June 2010, the District Court (McKenna, J.,) rejected that argument, finding that, in view of its importance. the tape was properly discoverable despite the claim of journalist privilege

recording was somehow protected by a journalist's privilege. Jane Doe responded, and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) held a hearing and listened to the tape in camera. The district court then ruled that the tape was not protected by the journalist's privilege

en pond rig civl cases n federal court In West Palm Beach against Epstein. A status check Is set for Thursday in those cases before U.S. Claim Judge Kennel Marra. Dog mad have welled the lawsuit for 550.000 but b asking for $50 ratan ter damages. Cassell said Tuesday. -Jane Doe was repeatedly sexually assaul

day in those cases before U.S. Claim Judge Kennel Marra. Dog mad have welled the lawsuit for 550.000 but

cKenna reserved ruLng on whether the recording will be re'eased to atierneYs representing young women who were sexually abused by Epstein as mfrors. McKenna didn't Wen to the recanting tiring the hearing. Fon Lauderdale attorney Bald Edwards and Utah allomey and low professor Paul Casten ors flghtng to

ne Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-MARRA (S.D. Fla.) case (which was consolidated with Do

- Jane Doe -- filed a proper subpoena for the tape in the U.S. District Court for the South District of New York. In June 2010, the District Court (McKenna, J.,) denied the Daily News' motion to quash the subpoena, finding that in view of its importance, the tape was properly discoverable despite the c

k; read e-mails; read and revise 2255 CMA memo 1.70hr $850.00 03/12/2009 RDC Revise template subpoena for work. med and school; review JD #2 -7 Marra orders 0.80 hr $400.00 03/12/2009 RDC Finalize Motion for Viewo and Motion for Addition& Time; review cases re: work product 0.90 hr $450.00

Professional Services Rendered: 03/16/2009 MJP Getting up to speed on files as per RDC and meeting with R. Critton, Esq., B. 4.40 hr $1.320.00 McKenna and R. Budnyk 03/16/2009 RHB Legal research re: 5th Amended indentification of witnesses 0.75 hr $225.00 03/16/2009 RHB Draft responses to Mo