Epstein Secrets

dant's MOTION to Dismiss (42) Amended Complaint and for More Definite Statement in case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM in case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 10/24/2008. (ir) (Entered: 10/27/2008) 10/28/2008 Reset Deadlines as to Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss (49) Amended Complaint and for More Defin

AND ORDER OF TRANSFER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Magistrate Judge James M. Hopkins no longer assigned as referral judge in case. Case transferred to Judge Marra's paired Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge James M. Hopkins on 10/8/08. (lw1) (Entered: 10/08/2008) Order Requiring C

ed as referral judge in case. Case transferred to Judge Marra's paired Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson. Sig

tion re 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant, or Alternatively, for an Enlgargement of Time to Serve Process, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by 6/23/2008. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit for Richard Bamett)(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/13/2008)

vene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross Motion to Compel. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this day of , 2007: at West Palm Beach, Florida. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: William L. Riches, Esutti c Roy Black. Esquire EFTA00179170 (Rev. 06/2005)5^Iled Document Tracking Form Case

, 2007: at West Palm Beach, Florida. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: William L. Ri

icers or employees or their assistants. The Court, drawing upon the See Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Incorporated Memorandum of Law at 19-26. 2 Black. Srebnick. Komspan & Stum 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131. Phone: • Fax: • www.RoyBlack.c

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

o Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions of Jane Doe No.3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (hereinafter, the Motion"), with incorporated memorandum of law. In support, Defendant states: I. RESPONSE WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM O