Epstein Secrets

Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmukumALINVBSTIOMOR

tprfl=HTMLEttifm=NotSet&mt... 4/10/2009 EFTA00722723 Page 3 of 3 800 So.2d 706 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D283I (Cite as: 800 So.2d 706) (Fla.1999), the supreme court again discussed 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D2831 Langston and, without expressly overruling it, stated that the principle

s in LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson; deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 23, line 4; p. 38, line 22. R. 809-10, citing amended complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scot

ll be upheld if there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record." Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999). "This rule applies in cases of summary judgments as well." Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1989); see also Rivernider, su

Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmemeom. I INVBSTIOM

MLEttifm=NotSet&mt... 4/10/2009 EFTA00614453 Page 3 of 3 800 So.2d 706 Page 2 800 So.2d 706, 26 Fla... Weekly D2831 (Cite as: 800 So.2d 706) (Fla.1999), the supreme court again discussed 800 So.2d 706, 26 Fla.'. Weekly D2831 Langston and, without expressly overruling it, stated that the principle