tprfl=HTMLEttifm=NotSet&mt... 4/10/2009 EFTA00722723 Page 3 of 3 800 So.2d 706 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D283I (Cite as: 800 So.2d 706) (Fla.1999), the supreme court again discussed 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D2831 Langston and, without expressly overruling it, stated that the principle

s inordinate." Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So. 2d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boecher, 733 So. 2d 993, 994 (Fla.1999) (noting the lack of "affidavits, depositions or other sworn testimony in the record to support Allstate's claims."). Here, Edwards fails to do so,

ll be upheld if there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record." Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999). "This rule applies in cases of summary judgments as well." Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1989); see also Rivernider, su

MLEttifm=NotSet&mt... 4/10/2009 EFTA00614453 Page 3 of 3 800 So.2d 706 Page 2 800 So.2d 706, 26 Fla... Weekly D2831 (Cite as: 800 So.2d 706) (Fla.1999), the supreme court again discussed 800 So.2d 706, 26 Fla.'. Weekly D2831 Langston and, without expressly overruling it, stated that the principle