Epstein Secrets

00798365 2 3 4 f 7 4 a 10 11 12 13 13 17 IS 20 21 22 23 24 25 117 transfer of a➢aota by Mr. Epstein that waa filed with Judge Marra? A No. I never hoard of that. Q Did you review the order entered by Judge Marra where he found that there wa➢ no evidence to support the filing

fer of a➢aota by Mr. Epstein that waa filed with Judge Marra? A No. I never hoard of that. Q Did you revie

Yeah. I heard of Bill Scharer. Bill Scherer 1 defendants? 4 is a prominent Fort Lauderdale attorney who wa➢ a 0 A Sure. 3 client. His firm Conrad Scherer -- yeah, I've 1 Q And before you would file that complaint, 10 practiced here since 1975. And I had a number of cases 10 you would make sure

hought were very, very high-caliber -- extremely high-caliber. I got to know more people there, of course. One of the clients of the firm was the Conrad Scherer firm. The Conrad Scherer firm was 20 ran by Bill Scherer. Bill Scherer la one of most 21 prominent lawyers in South Florida, certainly in 32 Se

Mr. Epstein to post a multi-million-dollar bond. Judge Marra threw that out, stating that there was no basis

was shown to the investors, and there is testimony to that fact. Then Mr. Edwards filed a motion. It was a motion asking that the court -- Judge Marra -- federal district court -- to enter a bond -- enter an order requiring Mr. Epstein to post a multi-million-dollar bond. Judge Marra threw that o

2 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 this Ponzi scheme. On November 20, 2009, the law firm of Conrad Scherer initiated a lawsuit against Rothstein and others entitled Razorback Funding, again, a copy of which is provided to the Court and is relied upon as

s in LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson; deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 23, line 4; p. 38, line 22. R. 809-10, citing amended complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scot

tigations into over one-half of the attorneys employed by RRA. At or about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereina

B; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in

]; Information Charging Scott W. Rothstein in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN On November 20, 2009, the lawfirm of Conrad Scherer filed a complaint, Razorback cause in this case, is well established by his affidavit filed in support of his original summary judgment motion. [ci

B; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in

d before he was criminally charged last month with using the firm to run a $1.2 billion investment racket."). On November 20, 2009, the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a complaint, Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Com