Epstein Secrets

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disclosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court wil

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

EFTA00231327 Page 2 of I I Wdstlaw. 76912d 389 769 2d 389 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 ..241 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant, v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appel lee. No. 99.2182. Oct. 27, 1999. Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1999. Following divorce, parties

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disdosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court will

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

00232447 Page 2 of Wdstlaw. 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389.24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant. v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appel lee. No. 99-2182. Oct. 27, 1999. Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1999. Following divorce, parties

r, basically, a freeze order. Mr. Edwards, 16 on behalf of two of his Jane Does, tried to get 17 that order so it would become public. Judge 18 Marra said, no, and they keep trying and trying 19 and trying, but that's another issue. I did 20 raise that with you, and I believe Mr. Kuvin was 21

itself, but I trust that all of the cases before Judge Marra, all the cases that are before me in state court

om the essential requirement of law in granting this discovery," and it refers to a case called Smith vs. TIB Bank of the Keys, 687 So.2d. 895, a Third District case, 1997, and that quotation then from that case by the Fifth in the Ballast case says "by alleging fraud as well as breach EFTA00776412 48 1