Epstein Secrets

being taken advantage of. Taken advantage of through the forging of an order -- forging of an order that purported to have the signature of Judge Marra -- a tremendously well-respected jurist in this community, now taken senior status. I, meaning Mr. Epstein, was not only concerned about Rothstei

an order that purported to have the signature of Judge Marra -- a tremendously well-respected jurist in this

have violated my order. The replies are being ignored. I do not expect that to be repeated, absent sanctions. Is that understood? Both sides? Ms. Rockenbach? DRAFT ONLY !!!! NOT PROOFREAD EFTA00792813 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MS. ROCKEN

er criminal exposure if the NPA gets revoked -- or whatever the terminology is -- MR. LINK: That's correction, Your Honor. THE COURT: -- in Judge Marra's court, assuming he's still the Judge on the case. MR. SCAROLA: Just to clarify that point, if I could. THE COURT: Sure. MR. SCAROLA: The non-p

That's correction, Your Honor. THE COURT: -- in Judge Marra's court, assuming he's still the Judge on the ca

suggesting we are doing that. Again, this is not the work of Mr. Scarola. This is not the work of Mr. Edwards. This is not the work of you or Ms. Rockenbach. This is the work of Mr. Epstein -- MR. LINK: I agree it is. THE COURT: -- making these allegations in subparagraph H, 1 through 3 -- some weird

en (e.g., Jane Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-cv-80893-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.)) and/or a related federal Cri

L 33401 Via email: [email protected] [email protected] Re: Your Possession of Confidential and Privileged Materials Dear Mr. Link and Ms. Rockenbach: I write on behalf of three of my clients, whom I will refer to as L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. I believe you are familiar with their identities as ch