Epstein Secrets

7NG SERVICE, INC. . - 7 S11,17i-i995 1431Sel'OnlileicliRep—mtinie.ac EFTA00617921 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 case is pending before Judge Marra. And one of the threshold issues in that case was whether victims rights attach prior to the filing of a federal indictment. And Judge Marra ruled

0 11 12 13 14 15 16 case is pending before Judge Marra. And one of the threshold issues in that case wa

R. SCAROLA: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. So the language was utilized from Levin and Etchaverria in order to support the oral decision in the Fourth District Court of Appeal. But again, the fact that the argument in good faith may erode the ethics argument doesn't dispel the concern that the Court has,

h Amendment right not to do so. "Stonewalling and delaying," Horowitz said. "I'm not surprised." Horowitz said he has asked US. District Judge Kenneth Marra to order Epstein to turn over the information. A local attorney for Epstein, Jack Goldberger, did not respond to a re- quest seeking comment. E

isclosure will be ordered." Seeking to keep the agreement sealed, Assistant U.S. Attorney argued that the agreement is not part of any case before Marra. "The non-prosecution agreement has never been filed under seal in federal court," he wrote. He also denied that the agreement has been inaccuratel

f Writer Wednesday, July 01, 2009 €driki- PRINTTHIS WEST PALM BEACH — A lawyer for financier Jeffrey Epstein have filed an emergency request with Fourth District of Appeal seeking to block the unsealing of Epstein's secret non-prosecution agreement with United States Attorney's Office. A circuit judge has or

go first? 14 MS. SHULLMAN: Mr. Edwards. 15 THE COURT: Mr. Edwards. 16 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, inasmuch as 17 Mr. Epstein is relying on Judge Marra's 18 order to support the argument that the 19 nonprosecution agreement needs to remain 20 sealed, I'd like to address that if you are 21 inc

omity, your Honor, 4 this Court should defer to Judge Marra 5 because, A, he has already ruled on the 6 d

, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180886 44 I 1 before, your Honor. 2 Your Honor, we do intend to take 3 certiorari on this to the Fourth District 4 Court. 5 THE COURT: That's why I figure 6 between the written rule and the disclosure 7 give you a chance to catch your breath and 8 do t

is 24 Court should defer to the rulings of 25 Judge Marra already. SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COUR

e 22 and that in our mind is equally important 23 as the fact in the interest of comity this 24 Court should defer to the rulings of 25 Judge Marra already. SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00231387 41 1 As to Mr. Kuvin's argument that he 2 has a client that is in sta

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 before, your Honor. Your Honor, we do intend to take certiorari on this to the Fourth District Court. THE COURT: That's why I figure between the written rule and the disclosure give you a chance to catch your breath and do that. I guess yo

in Jane Doe No. 2. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80893-Marra/Johnson on January 5, 2011. (See D.E. 226) (Ex.

A040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ revealing relevant information in pretrial discovery." (emphasis added). The Fourth District explained in Brancaccio that the "Supreme Court has disapproved of procedures which require a party to surrender one constitutional right in order