Epstein Secrets

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, / DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradiey J. Edwards, by and thr

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal entirpitge that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing ever clients intended to pursue an appeal of that dismi

at there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein sinisly chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein’s required complian

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that d

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

From: Darren — —_ To: Jackie Perczek Date: 4/7/2011 1:44 PM Subject: Privileged and Confidential Attachments: Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims’ Rights Act | Main Justice.pdf; Attorneys want Jeffrey Epstein agreement thrown out.pdf; Edwards Articles - Rush Interview 2. pdf; Edwards Articles - Rush Interview.pdf; Part.005 Additional Articles. Darren K. Indyke Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 301 East 66th Street, 10B New York, New York 10065 Telephone: (212) 517-2052 Direct:

pending civil cases in federal court in West Palm Beach against Epstein. A status check is set for Thursday in those cases before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. Doe could have settled the lawsuit for $50,000 but is asking for $50 million in damages, Cassell said Tuesday. "Jane Doe was repeatedly sexually ass

in those cases before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. Doe could have settled the lawsuit for $50,000 b

From: Darren Indyke > To: Jackie Perczek Date: 4/7/2011 1:27 PM Subject: Privileged and Confidential Attachments: Edwards Articles -1.doc; Edwards Articles - 12.pdf; Edwards Articles - 10.pdf; Edwards Articles - 9.doc; Edwards Articles - 8.doc; Edwards Articles - 7.doc; Edwards Articles - 6.doc; Edwards Articles - 5.doc; Edwards Articles - 3.doc; Edwards Articles - 2.doc; Edwards Article - 13.pdf; Part.012 See additional articles. Darren K. Indyke Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 301 East 66th Stree

e government has "inaccurately described the agreement ... creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims.” U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the claims, even if true, haven't damaged Edwards’ case. "If and when such alleged mischaracterizations become relevant to an issue to be

will be ordered.” Seeking to keep the agreement sealed, Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee argued that the agreement is not part of any case before Marra. "The non-prosecution agreement has never been filed under seal in federal court,” he wrote. He also denied that the agreement has been inaccuratel