Epstein Secrets

the CVRA did not apply because Epstein had never been formally charged in federal court. I also appeared in a hearing on July 11, 2008, before Judge Marra. The case was inactive for several years, the victims being content to litigate their civil damage claims against Epstein. In mid-2010, the case be

so appeared in a hearing on July 11, 2008, before Judge Marra. The case was inactive for several years, the vi

remedies they claim are available to them (pages 14-15). prepared the motion to dismiss for lack of standing. He needs assistance from someone in the Civil Division to specifically address the issue of the availability of remedies specified by the victims. I have attached the victims' response to our motion to

the CVRA did not apply because Epstein had never been formally charged in federal court. I also appeared in a hearing on July 11, 2008, before Judge Marra. The case was inactive for several years, the victims being content to litigate their civil damage claims against Epstein. In mid-2010, the case be

o appeared in a hearing on July 11, 2008, before Judge Marra. The case was inactive for several years, the vi

remedies they claim are available to them (pages 14-15). prepared the motion to dismiss for lack of standing. He needs assistance from someone in the Civil Division to specifically address the issue of the availability of remedies specified by the victims. I have attached the victims' response to our motion to d

as signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10,

of the agents and myself the matter was, in fact, "currently under investigation." The NPA was signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10, 2008 and May 30, 2008. During the period that the letters were sent, Epstein was asserting that: (a

ms against me was because he disliked my insistence on pushing the case forward. After the NPA was signed, USA Acosta recommended that I transfer to the Civil Division. I agreed to meet with them and talk about their work. Despite USA Acosta's recommendation, I decided not to follow his recommendation, and I staye

NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the E

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (1JSAO-SDFLA). 1 write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligati

#1 and #21 United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to yo

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA). I write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligatio

NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the E

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (1JSAO-SDFLA). 1 write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligati