Epstein Secrets

TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

overy appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Id.; see also Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 507-508 (1947); Farnsworth v. Proctor and Gamble Co., 758 F.2d 1545, 1547 (11th Cir. 1985)(the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

--- 13 v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 507-508 (1947); Farnsworth v. Proctor and Gamble Co., 758 F.2d 1545, 1547 (1

s Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80119-Marra/Johnson, Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, case no. 08-

E REQUIRED TO APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION MORE THAN ONCE The district court has discretion to fashion a protective order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). Farnsworth v. Procter & Gamble Co., 758 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1985). This discretion “does not depend upon a legal privilege.” Id.; Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. So

HERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08.80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED

07) (internal quotations omitted). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are broadly written and "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible." Farnsworth I Procter and Gamble Co., 758 F.2d 1545, 1547 (11th Cir.1985). Thus, as this Court has previously ruled in this case, the bottom line is that "[d]is