Epstein Secrets

u were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-1

ROLA: Same objection. Id. at page 216; line 14. Q: And I will separate out the extent that you were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-18. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 216; line 19-20. Q: Has Ms.—have you

re I am not going to answer that question. Id. at 18-19. Q: If Mr. Fisten represented that he was associated with the Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami-Dade County Police Department, would you find that conduct inappropriate. Id. at 21-24. MR. SCAROLA: Same instruction and I would also observe with regard to each of the hypoth

ROLA: Same objection. Id. at page 216; line 14. Q: And I will separate out the extent that you were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-18. 11 Tonja Haddad. P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585404 MR. SCAROLA

u were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-1

re I am not going to answer that question. Id. at 18-19. Q: If Mr. Fisten represented that he was associated with the Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami-Dade County Police Department, would you find that conduct inappropriate. Id. at 21-24. MR. SCAROLA: Same instruction and I would also observe with regard to each of the hypoth

F FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

to lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings." Id. at *I. Moreover, the stay in Ventura was granted on motion of the defendant Miami-Dade County Police Department because it would be prejudiced by its codefendant, a former police officer, asserting the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer "in response to th

F FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defen

to lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings." Id. at *1. Moreover, the stay in Ventura was granted on motion of the defendant Miami-Dade County Police Department because it would be prejudiced by its codefendant, a former police officer, asserting the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer "in response to th