Epstein Secrets

DONE AND ORDERED this Augu~t fs;· 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA RJOON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

S MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein'

3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church, 190 F.R.D. 345,348 (E.D. Penn. 2000). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy their burden of demonstrating good cause for a protec

ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. Winn LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church 190 F.R.D. 345, 348 (E.D. Penn. 2000). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy their burden of demonstrating good cause for a protec

NE AND ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re /went Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church 190 F.R.D. 345, 348 (E.D. Penn. 2000). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy their burden of demonstrating good cause for a protec