Epstein Secrets

e of (one of which we have been "invited" to attend), and we need to discuss our position before I attend. Here are the most recent items: 1. Judge Marra has asked us to appear on Friday, June 12th to address whether "Epstein's defense of the civil suits breaches the Non-Prosecution Agreement." 2. Th

ore I attend. Here are the most recent items: 1. Judge Marra has asked us to appear on Friday, June 12th to ad

on the motion to unseal in state court is set for Wednesday, June 10'h. We have been given notice of that hearing, along with Michael McAuliffe from the State Attorney's Office. 4. On May 26, 2009, Epstein's counsel filed a pleading in federal court that essentially argues that the civil claims filed under 18 USC 2255 must

ay have civil damages claims against Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal entirpitge that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing ever clients intended to pursue an appeal of that dismi

at there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein sinisly chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

e government has "inaccurately described the agreement ... creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims.” U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the claims, even if true, haven't damaged Edwards’ case. "If and when such alleged mischaracterizations become relevant to an issue to be

will be ordered.” Seeking to keep the agreement sealed, Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee argued that the agreement is not part of any case before Marra. "The non-prosecution agreement has never been filed under seal in federal court,” he wrote. He also denied that the agreement has been inaccuratel

agers for prostitution. Epstein is allowed out, though, each day from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m., a Sheriff's Office spokesman said. Displeased with the way the State Attorney's Office handled the case, Palm Beach police forwarded information to the FBI. INFORMATIONAL BOX: Young women have sued. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013426 --- PAGE B

ered moot. 3. Prior to filing of a Motion For Protective Order, Mr. Leopold and the undersigned conferred and agreed in writing with the consent of the State Attorney's Office to the taking of Jane Doe No.1's deposition on February 20, 2008. The parties have also agreed that Mr. Leopold will accept service for Jane Doe's

oe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80232-Marra/Johnson, United States District Court for the So

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

o send to me any information that he wanted me to consider. Nothing was provided. I also advised Attorney Edwards that he should consider contacting the State Attorney's Office, if he so wished. I understand that no contact with that office was made. Attorney Edwards had alluded to so I advised him that, to my knowledge,..