Epstein Secrets

foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister, and other world leaders." Menninger Decl. Ex. C at 4-5. On April 7, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Marra denied Plaintiff's Joinder Motion, ordered the portions of the Joinder Motion pertaining to non-parties Although the Complaint does not explicitly

. C at 4-5. On April 7, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Marra denied Plaintiff's Joinder Motion, ordered the p

force, Inc. v. Alden Personnel, Inc., 288 F.Supp.2d 513, 516 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) 16, 21 Kirk v. Heppt, 532 F.Supp.2d 586 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 14 Krepps v. Reiner, 588 F.Supp.2d 471, 483 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 7 Liberman v. Gelstein, 80 N.Y.2d 429, 590 (N.Y. 1992) 22 McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F.Supp.2d 584, 601 (E.D

vene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross Motion to Compel. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this day of , 2007: at West Palm Beach, Florida. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: William L. Riches, Esutti c Roy Black. Esquire EFTA00179170 (Rev. 06/2005)5^Iled Document Tracking Form Case

, 2007: at West Palm Beach, Florida. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: William L. Ri

e unprotected assertions that anything in the computers is incriminating as a precondition to asserting the act-of-production privilege. See Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17, 21 (2001)("[W]e have emphasized that one of the Fifth Amendment's basic functions . . . is to protect innocent men . . . who otherwis

oe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00317246 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

486 (1951). Epstein, in fact, can deny the occurrence of the nesindta alleged and still maintain the safe harbor of the 5'" Amendment2 ate Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (1991). 2 See PeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4d. DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan. 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964Xthe Fifth

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

ceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985), citing Lefkowitz v. Turlev 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). See also Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17, 21, 121 S.Ct. 1252 (2001)(The Fifth Amendment privilege is also available to those who claim innocence. One of the Fifth Amendment's

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

ceedings." Edwin v. Price 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11i' Cir. 1985), citing Lefkowitz v. Turley 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). See also Ohio v. Reiner 532 U.S. 17, 21, 121 S.Q. 1252 (2001)(The Fifth Amendment privilege is also available to those who claim innocence. One of the Fifth Amendment's "b

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEI

eedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985), citin Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). See also Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17, 21, 121 S.Ct. 1252 (2001)(The Fifth Amendment privilege is also available to those who claim innocence. One of the Fifth Amendment's

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

ceedings." Edwin v. Price 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11i' Cir. 1985), citing Lefkowitz v. Turley 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). See also Ohio v. Reiner 532 U.S. 17, 21, 121 S.Q. 1252 (2001)(The Fifth Amendment privilege is also available to those who claim innocence. One of the Fifth Amendment's "b

ect the strength of ow case, Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011947 EFTA00226735 Ltd' tu0 .244CAIYU 0:r

of their trip and that one of the motivating purposes of requiring victim to accompany him was to facilitate their sexual relationship. 3) U.S. I Reiner, 397 I Supp. 2d 101 (D. Me. 2005). This case discusses the forfeiture of assets related to a "massage parlor"/ "health club" that was a front for p