Epstein Secrets

15, and 17 EFTA 0025I840 EFTA01334305 He faced a maximum of 15 years and was given 18 months. In court Friday, Edwards told U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra the plea agreement "was worked out behind the victims' backs." Edwards said that part of the confidential agreement was that the federal government

lead guilty to abusing one girl in state court so that he wouldn't be prosecuted in federal court for the 100 other girls he molested," Edwards told Marra. The two girls, identified in court papers as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, did not testify on Friday. Epstein's attorneys were not present at the hea

report provided by Off. Trion. File 300 November 29, 2004 Det. Krauel On November 29, 20041 reviewed an intelligence report completed by Officer Munyan regarding SDNY_GM_02764982 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA 00251824 EFTA01334289 According the report, Alfr

nt with one underage girl. EFTA00077947 He faced a maximum of 15 years and was given 18 months. In court Friday, Edwards told U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra the plea agreement "was worked out behind the victims' backs." Edwards said that part of the confidential agreement was that the federal government

lead guilty to abusing one girl in state court so that he wouldn't be prosecuted in federal court for the 100 other girls he molested," Edwards told Marra. The two girls, identified in court papers as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, did not testify on Friday. Epstein's attorneys were not present at the hea

advise that she works at Abercrombie and Fitch at the Wellington Green Mall and was introduced to Epstein through a friend who worked there. • told Munyan that Epstein allows then to come over anytime and use the house and pool. Munyan would asi what was in the envelope that was given to • and was t

Magistrate Judirnan VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). (Set inisevcoores scox4 pp): a) Re-filed Case CI YES 0 NO 6) Related Cases (OYES ONO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra DOCKET See Attached NUMBER VII. CAUSE OF ACTION Cie the U.S. Civil Statute under which you arc filing and Write a Lind Slalomed of Cause (Do wt

instigator of such lawsuits. 2544 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB-001978 EFTA00184396 Case 9:08-cv-8073

ation pertaining to this case. Members of the Burglary Strike Force had previously been conducting surveillance on both Epstein and Robson. Officer Munyan was assigned to monitor the Epstein home and Sgt Sorge and Officer Minot were assigned to monitor Robson. Both teams provided a surveillance log th

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs.

E # 22 ************************** Reported By: RECAREY, JOSEPH 11/17/05 Entered By,: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 11/17/05 On November 15, 2005, Officer Munyan and I responded to the Palm Beach Gardens Mall food court section to meet with =Ma. At approximately 5:10 p.m.,AMINIMMbarrived and met with us at

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFRE

15 16 17 18. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q. Any others? A. Sergeant Sorge and Officer Minot. Q. Are they still with the department? A Officer Munyan is no longer with the department. Sergeant Sorge has since retired. And Officer Minot is still with the police department. Q. All right And what d

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFRE

7 Q. Okay. 8 A. But actual conversation with him regarding the 9 investigation, no. 10 Q. Did you ever have a conversation with 11 Officer Munyan at any time from the beginning of the 12 world until today about that particular report that 13 was authored in November of 2004? 14 A. No, I d