Epstein Secrets

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disclosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court wil

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

.96 tli 100, j390.91 (11th 1th C't . 1986) (documents tel 63 defendant s change of • aigi. is • •,,., • ti , :, •,, plea and sentencing Gould be: lieldeollonly.0 n finding of a cempellini Intefreat that justified • , • it,1 1,'. . : • ' •• 1../ . !I cr. ; I &did 'if public acOekS).•

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disdosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court will

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

.96 tli 100, j390.91 (11th 1th C't . 1986) (documents tel 63 defendant s change of • aigi. is • •,,., • ti , :, •,, plea and sentencing Gould be: lieldeollonly.0 n finding of a cempellini Intefreat that justified • , • it,1 1,'. . : • ' •• 1../ . !I cr. ; I &did 'if public acOekS).•

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs,

those original documents, the defendant does not have possession of them. The necessary predicate does not exist, and Sporck is not triggered. See Gould, 825 F.2d at 680 ("the equities may not favor the application of the Sporck exception if the files from which the documents had been culled . . . w