Epstein Secrets

ncluding Prince Andrew. That the allegations were improper and irresponsible is not merely an assertion by Dershowitz; United States District Judge Marra has expressly held that the "lurid" allegations were "unnecessary," "immaterial," and "impertinent" to the federal lawsuit. See Exhibit A. Judge Mar

assertion by Dershowitz; United States District Judge Marra has expressly held that the "lurid" allegations w

n behalf of Jane Doe No. 3. even though they represent her in connection with the Federal Action. Plaintiffs referred Dershowitz to the law firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, which is representing Jane Doe No. 3 for purposes of this action. Boies, Schiller & Flexner likewise declined to accept service on behalf of Jane

assertion by Dershowitz; United States District Judge Marra has expressly held that the "lurid" allegations w

ncluding Prince Andrew. That the allegations were improper and irresponsible is not merely an assertion by Dershowitz; United States District Judge Marra has expressly held that the "lurid" allegations were "unnecessary," "immaterial," and "impertinent" to the federal lawsuit. See Exhibit A. Judge Mar

n behalf of Jane Doe No. 3, even though they represent her in connection with the Federal Action. Plaintiffs referred Dershowitz to the law firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, which is representing Jane Doe No. 3 for purposes of this action. Boies, Schiller & Flexner likewise declined to accept service on behalf of Jane D

United States of America Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, [ECF No. 291-1] (the "Federal Action").

e undersigned attorneys will take the video deposition(s) of: Name and Address Date and Time Place of Takin Saturday, January 16, 2016 9:00 am Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 356-0011 upon oral examination for purpose of discovery or use as evidence in t

cuments concerning your retention of the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, including but not limited to: signed letter of r

ral part of the civil proceeding, particularly when the condition is asserted as an issue by the party seeking closure” (emphasis added)). Il. JUDGE MARRA’S ORDER IN HIS CASE DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT THE RECORDS BE SEALED IN THIS CASE. Dershowitz also appears to contend that Judge Marra’s order striking s

he party seeking closure” (emphasis added)). Il. JUDGE MARRA’S ORDER IN HIS CASE DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT THE REC