Epstein Secrets

ng the information that you have in that regard voluntarily, as opposed to us having to conduct formal discovery to get it. As you also know, Judge Marra has recently ordered discovery to proceed in this case. We obviously would like for that process to go as smoothly as possible and want to avoid be

E DOE, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, JUNE 12, 2009 7 VS. 8 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 9 Defendant. 10 11 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPEARANCES: 13 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Mermelstein & Horowitz 15 18205 Biscayne Bou

ct formal discovery to get it. As you also know, Judge Marra has recently ordered discovery to proceed in this

mmary Judgment" pleadings (which we provided in their entirety to your Office as a courtesy six months ago) on March 18, 2011. Sincerely, s it74, Bradley J. dwards ?c' Paul . Cassell Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Cc: Special Agent in Charge John V. Gillies Miami FBI Field Office 16320

Case No. 08-CIV-801189 Order on Epstein's Emergency Motion for Order for the Preservation of Evidence Page 4 of 4 Courtesy copies: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra Counsel of Record Kendall Coffey, Esq. Coffey Burlington Office in the Grove, Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33133 Paul Singerm

(AS TO JANE DOE v. EPSTEIN, Case No. 08-CIV-80893 Marra/Johnson) Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafte

ein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB), (hereinafter "civil actions"). 3. In each of these civil actions, each of the Plaintiffs is represented by Bradley J. Edwards, William Berger and the RRA law firm, 1109 NE 2d Street, Hallendale Beach, Florida 33009-8515. Attorneys Russell Alder and Peter Feaman hav

IAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, / DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT’S M

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal entirpitge that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing ever clients intended to pursue an appeal of that dismi

at there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein sinisly chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

015546 --- PAGE BREAK --- Bradley J. Edwards STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Waa d ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared this day Bradley J. Edwards, who is personally known to me or ([_] _ produced , aS identification, and who, after being duly sworn, did state that he/she executed the fo

ble up or inundate you, as I know other ITN News colleagues have also been in touch with you. I just wanted to make sure I was on your radar if Judge Marra rules next week. Best, Donna Paine Sent from my iPad On Jan 23, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Paul Cassell <cassellp @law.utah.edu> wrote: Hi Donna, | am p

I just wanted to make sure I was on your radar if Judge Marra rules next week. Best, Donna Paine Sent from m

HERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED ST

non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control. 20. Copies of any and all documents tending to support your assertion that Bradley J. Edwards: a. has a reputation of being sleazy; b. has acted in a sleazy manner; c. has engaged in unethical conduct; d. has knowingly relied upon