Epstein Secrets

t of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, dete

lleged perpetrator. Alleged perpetrator intervened. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, determined that government had violated CVRA, but after alleged perpetrator's death, alleged victim's

equitable remedies after petitioners have proven a violation of statutory provisions. It Hardison v. Cohen, 375 F.3d 1262, 1266 (11th Cir. 2004); Nichols v. Ho per 173 F.3d 820, 824 (11th Cir. 1999); C e Ala. Hosp Ass'n v Beasley, 702 £2d 955, 962 (1 I th Cir. 1983) (in light of statutory violation,

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED

the Government has committed. Settled law holds that "the nature of the remedy is to be determined by the nature and scope of the . . . violation." Nichols v. Hopper, 173 F.3d 820, 824 (11th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation omitted). And, "[a]t the initial pleading stage, a plaintiff may establish standi

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED

the Government has committed. Settled law holds that "the nature of the remedy is to be determined by the nature and scope of the . . . violation." Nichols'. Hopper, 173 F.3d 820, 824 (11th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation omitted). And, "Nit the initial pleading stage, a plaintiff may establish standing

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED

estions would be a waste of time. Moreover, generally "the nature of the remedy is to be determined by the nature and scope of the . . . violation." Nichols'. Hopper, 173 F.3d 820, 824 (11th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation omitted). Until the Court identifies the scope of the Government's violations, it

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED

estions would be a waste of time. Moreover, generally "the nature of the remedy is to be determined by the nature and scope of the . . . violation." Nichols v. Hopper, 173 F.3d 820, 824 (11th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation omitted). Until the Court identifies the scope of the Government's violations, it