Epstein Secrets

NS Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1, Intervenor/Appellants hereby certify that the following persons have an interest in the outcome of this case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo

. The prior civil discovery order relied upon by Judge Marra, DE188:3-4, resulted from the efforts of the civ

sub nom. Gelestino v. United States, 445 U.S. 967 (1980) 15 United States v. Deloitte LLP, 610 F.3d 129 (D.C.Cir. 2010) 23 United States v. Edelman, 458 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2006) 26 United States v. Gonzalez, 669 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2012) 55 United States v. Hare, 49 F.3d 447 (8th Cir.), c

nd federal government prosecutorial authorities, are DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida this 18ih day of June, 2013. Kenneth Marra United States District Judge cc. All counsel II EFTA00602817

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, VS.

es against defendant when discussions occurred; general discussions of leniency did not transform meeting into plea negotiations); United States v. Edelman, 458 F.3d 791, 804-06 (811' Cir. 2006)(Rule 410 inapplicable to statements made during preindictment meetings by defendant seeking to avoid indictm

and, investigators say, underage girls By Andrew Marra Palm Beach Post - Monday, August 14, 2006 http:

illionaire Financier (New York, NY; Palm Beach, FL; Santa F... Page 9 of 32 extraordinary in his ability to pick up on quantitative relations," says Edelman. "He came to see us recently. He is concerned with this basic question: Is it true that the brain is not a computer? He is very quick." Then there