Epstein Secrets

07/08/2009 Mercedes Estrada Bradley Edwards Judge Marra's July 6th Order Joint W/P Priv. 05476-05494 07

ffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 05469 07/08/2009 Mercedes Estrada Bradley Edwards Judge Marra's July 6th Order Joint W/P Priv. 05476-05494 07/08/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards NPA from Marie Villafana Joint W/P Priv. 05546 08/03/20

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716.26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

ffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 05469 07/08/2009 Mercedes Estrada Bradley Edwards Judge Marra's July 61" Order Joint W/P Priv. 05476-05494 07/08/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards NPA from Marie Villafana Joint W/P Priv. 05546 08/03/20

07/08/2009 Mercedes Estrada Bradley Edwards Judge Marra's July 61" Order Joint W/P Priv. 05476-05494 07

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716-26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

u were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-1

ROLA: Same objection. Id. at page 216; line 14. Q: And I will separate out the extent that you were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-18. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 216; line 19-20. Q: Has Ms.—have you

uld not respond on the basis of privilege. Id. at page 288; line 15-21. A: Privilege. Id. at page 288; line 22. Counsel for Epstein then discusses Ken Jenne: Q: Did Mr. Jenne, did you ever direct Mr. Jenne to do any investigation on the Epstein cases? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, at pa

g the case that he did was because of his perception as to why the federal court case was brought but never served that met with an order of Judge Marra, as I understand, of dismissal, Mr. Edwards may need to explain that. But that's not before me here. What's Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. E

ought but never served that met with an order of Judge Marra, as I understand, of dismissal, Mr. Edwards may

tic) -- purpose of the conversation with this officer. No answer, yet he's listed on the witness list at this time. Then the conversation turns to Ken Jenne, former Sheriff who worked at RRA during the time in question. THE COURT: What page are you on? MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: I'm at the top of page 15. S

ROLA: Same objection. Id. at page 216; line 14. Q: And I will separate out the extent that you were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-18. 11 Tonja Haddad. P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585404 MR. SCAROLA

u were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-1

uld not respond on the basis of privilege. Id. at page 288; line 15-21. A: Privilege. Id. at page 288; line 22. Counsel for Epstein then discusses Ken Jenne: Q: Did Mr. Jenne, did you ever direct Mr. Jenne to do any investigation on the Epstein cases? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, at pa

. Docket from Doe v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. 8. Any and all exhibits listed and/or used by

WITNESSES I. Scott W. Rothstein do Marc Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 2. Ken Jenne do Broward Co. Sheriff Office 2601 W. Broward Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312-1308 3. William Scherer do Conrad & Scherer, LLP PB Box 14723 Ft

. Docket from Doe v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. 8. Any and all exhibits listed by Edwards. 9.

HAVE TO PROVIDE ADDRESSES FOR ALL) JDQ WE HAVE TO PROVIDE THE ADDRESSES NOW OR CAN WE SAY ADDRESSES TO BE PROVIDED?[ I. Scott W. Rothstein 2. Ken Jenne 3. William Scherer The following people are listed in the privilege log unless otherwise noted: 4. Spencer Kuvin 5. Katherine Ezell 6. Ami E

. Docket from Doe v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. 8. Any and all exhibits listed by Edwards. 9.

ices of the undersigned at a mutually convenient time and date. TRIAL WITNESSES (WE HAVE TO PROVIDE ADDRESSES FOR ALL) I. Scott W. Rothstein 2. Ken Jenne 3. William Scherer The following people are listed in the privilege log unless otherwise noted: 4. Spencer Kuvin 5. Katherine Ezell 6. Ami E

. Docket from Doe v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. 8. Any and all exhibits listed and/or used by

WITNESSES 1. Scott W. Rothstein do Marc Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 2. Ken Jenne c/o Broward Co. Sheriff Office 2601 W. Broward Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312-1308 3. William Scherer do Conrad & Scherer, LLP PB Box 14723 F