Epstein Secrets

73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶16. 74. Edwards gave not

buse. Epstein also made perform oral sex on him and was to perform sex acts on (Epstein's live- in sex slave) in Epstein's presence. See Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice Regarding Evidence of Similar Acts of Sexual Assault, filed in Jane Doe v. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2010), as DE 197, (hereinafte

73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law finn of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 116. 74. Edwards gave not

made E.W. perform oral sex on him and was to perform sex acts on Nadia Marcinkova (Epstein's live- in sex slave) in Epstein's presence. See Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice Regarding Evidence of Similar Acts of Sexual Assault, filed in Jane Doe v. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2010), as DE 197, (hereinafte

73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶16. 74. Edwards gave not

es by another underage victim. Epstein engaged in one or more of the following acts with each of the then-minor girls at his mansion: See Plaintiff Jane Doe's Notice Regarding Evidence of Similar Acts of Sexual Assault, filed in Jane Doe I. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2010), as DE 197, (hereinafte

, 000-in: BANBEES Therefore, ‘the terms. of the NPA ad to pei Jane Doe from using the NPA to prove liability. . 5. - Epstein has filed an answer to. ‘Jane Doe’ s complaint, in witch he has invoked his Fifth Amendment right to silence with respect to the allegations that he molested. her asa child. Epstein ha

ons, . this tape: is the only: way that Jane Doe can: ‘put Epstein’ sown perceptions of what - a he has. done‘before the j jury and the only way that Jane. Doe’ can. put Epstein’ s.admissions and statement oe Msi amnnetatm op ef og ‘before, the jury.. As even: a quick: perusal of. the 1 more. ‘than 500 ent

accordingly provided notice of a possible deposition. Epstein alleges that Tommy Mottola was improperly noticed with a deposition. I did not notice Mattola for deposition. He was noticed for deposition by a law firm representing another one of Epstein’s victims — not by me. Epstein alleges that there wa

rds filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of L.M. See Complaint, L.M. v. Epstein, (Exhibit “V”’). 47. Jane Doe’s federal complaint indicated that she sought damages of more than $50,000,000. Listing the amount of damages sought in the complaint was in accord wit

73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit “N” at (16. 74. Edwards gave notic

in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment, Edwards had a sound legal basis for believing that Donald Trump, Allen Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mattola, David Copperfield and Governor Bill Richardson had relevant and discoverable information (Exhibit “A” — Edwards’ Statement of Undisputed Facts, para

ards filed a civil sot against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of L.M. See Complaint, LM. v. Epstein, (Exhibit “V”). 3 47. Jane Doe’s federal complaint indicated that she sought damages of more than $50,000,000. Listing the amount of damages sought in the complaint was in accord wit